How Santiane automated part of its support desk with AI
An entirely manual handling of incoming requests, on imperfect documents and within a strict regulatory framework. Standard cases are processed end to end, high-stakes cases always fall back to human review.

Imperfect documents, strict rules, and no room on the deadlines
Handling incoming requests was entirely manual. It tied up expert resources on repetitive tasks, with regulatory deadlines to meet on every case. The difficulty was not volume but the nature of the problem. Input data is imperfect by construction: scanned documents of varying quality, typos, heterogeneous formats. Business rules must be applied strictly, with no interpretation. And processing health data requires sovereign hosting, without routing through a third-party API outside the European Union.
manual processing
Every incoming request was read, qualified and handled by hand by expert resources, on repetitive tasks.
at the front of the process
Input data that is imperfect by nature: scans of varying quality, typos, heterogeneous formats.
never to be exposed
A sovereign hosting requirement that ruled out any off-the-shelf solution routing through a third-party API outside the European Union.
Santiane, FranceSantiane
Santiane is a health insurance brokerage group bringing together the Santiane, Neoliane and Julia Mutuelle brands.
The group handles high volumes of incoming requests, in a sector governed by strict legal rules and demanding confidentiality requirements on health data. Two constraints that made automation both necessary and delicate.
Automate the standard path, always escalate the exception
The principle is simple: the workflow never makes a decision it cannot justify. Anything that leaves the standard path goes out as a draft to a human.
Deployment in a sovereign environment
A self-hosted workflow on Santiane's own infrastructure, so that health data processing never leaves the controlled perimeter.
Reliable reading of imperfect documents
Every incoming request triggers two parallel extractions, one tuned for scanned documents, the other for text files. Both streams are merged before analysis.
Structured extraction with safeguards
No value is ever inferred. A confidence score is calculated and uncertain fields are explicitly flagged, rather than filled in with an assumption.
Deterministic routing
Business and regulatory rules are applied by a deterministic module, never by the model. The case then goes either to automatic processing or to a draft for a human.
Automatic for the standard, human for the exception
Compliant cases are processed end to end with no intervention. The workflow automatically switches to a draft as soon as a case leaves the standard path, so human validation is systematically preserved on high-stakes cases. All of it for a target cost below ten cents per case processed, API included, and eight weeks of implementation, without any health data leaving the group's infrastructure.
Want us to map your requests?
Free audit of your processes, we identify high-ROI use cases together, and quantify the gains before deploying anything.
More case studies
All case studiesMoose Knuckles
↗Audit
Three AI opportunities, quantified on the brand's own data
Doctolib
↗Adoption
From a handful of pioneers to 90 % building their own agents in three months
InfraVia Capital Partners
↗Internal GPT
How InfraVia equipped 100+ staff with AI using Copilot and Perplexity Enterprise
Newfund
↗Internal GPT
How Newfund tooled its investment process with 6 specialised AI agents on Dust